Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.)

Filed by the Registrant  x

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

SALEM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

SEC 1913 (04-05)

Persons who are to respond to the collection of information

contained in this form are not required to respond unless the

form displays a currently valid OMB control number.

Table of Contents

4880 Santa Rosa Road

Camarillo, CA 93012

(805) 987-0400

April 23, 2010

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Salem Communications Corporation (“Salem”). The Annual Meeting is scheduled to be held on Wednesday, June 2, 2010, at Salem’s corporate offices, which are located at 4880 Santa Rosa Road, Camarillo, California, at 9:30 a.m. local time. As described in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement, the agenda for the Annual Meeting includes:

The board of directors recommends that you vote FOR the election of the slate of director nominees. Please refer to the Proxy Statement for detailed information on the proposal. Directors and executive officers of Salem will be present at the Annual Meeting to respond to questions that our stockholders may have regarding the business to be transacted.

We urge you to vote your proxy as soon as possible. Your vote is very important, regardless of the number of shares you own. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, we urge you to vote your shares on-line, by telephone or by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card promptly in the accompanying postage prepaid envelope. You may, of course, attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person even if you have previously returned your proxy card. The approximate date on which this Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy card are first being sent to stockholders is April 23, 2010.

On behalf of the board of directors and all of the employees of Salem, we wish to thank you for your support.

Sincerely yours,

STUART W. EPPERSON

Chairman of the Board

EDWARD G. ATSINGER III

Chief Executive Officer

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on June 2, 2010: Our proxy statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 are available at

http://bnymellon.mobular.net/bnymellon/salm

If you have any questions concerning the Proxy Statement or the accompanying proxy card, or if you need any help in voting your shares, please telephone Christopher J. Henderson of Salem at (805) 987-0400.

PLEASE VOTE YOUR SHARES

ON-LINE, BY TELEPHONE OR BY

SIGNING, DATING AND RETURNING

THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD TODAY.

Table of Contents

4880 Santa Rosa Road

Camarillo, CA 93012

(805) 987-0400

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held on June 2, 2010

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Salem Communications Corporation (“Salem”) will be held on Wednesday, June 2, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. local time at Salem’s corporate offices, which are located at 4880 Santa Rosa Road, Camarillo, California, subject to adjournment or postponement by the board of directors, for the following purposes:

Only holders of record of Salem’s Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share, on April 9, 2010, the record date, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. A list of such stockholders will be available for examination by any stockholder at the time and place of the Annual Meeting.

Holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of the Class A common stock and of the Class B common stock must be present in person or by proxy in order for the Annual Meeting to be held. Therefore, we urge you to review the accompanying proxy card and either vote by (a) internet or by telephone as instructed in this proxy statement, or (b) by signing, dating and returning your completed proxy in the enclosed postage prepaid envelope whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting in person. If you attend the Annual Meeting and wish to vote your shares personally, you may do so by validly revoking your proxy as described below.

Prior to the voting thereof, a proxy may be revoked by the person executing such proxy by: (i) filing with the Secretary of Salem, prior to the commencement of the Annual Meeting, either a duly executed written notice dated subsequent to such proxy revoking the same or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or (ii) attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we would appreciate your response by indicating so at the appropriate box on the enclosed proxy card.

By order of the board of directors,

CHRISTOPHER J. HENDERSON

Secretary

Camarillo, California

April 23, 2010

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to

Be Held on June 2, 2010: Our proxy statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Annual

Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, are available at

http://bnymellon.mobular.net/bnymellon/salm

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.

TO VOTE YOUR SHARES, PLEASE VOTE

ONLINE, BY TELEPHONE OR BY

SIGNING AND DATING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD

AND MAILING IT PROMPTLY

IN THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE.

Table of Contents

SALEM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

4880 Santa Rosa Road

Camarillo, CA 93012

(805) 987-0400

PROXY STATEMENT

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held on June 2, 2010

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the board of directors (the “board” or the “board of directors”) of Salem Communications Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), of proxies for use at the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company (the “Annual Meeting”) scheduled to be held at the time and place and for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

INFORMATION REGARDING VOTING AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

General

At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders of the Company are being asked to consider and to vote upon the following proposal:

For information regarding this proposal, see the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS.”

Shares represented by properly executed proxies received by the Company will be voted at the Annual Meeting in the manner specified therein or, if no instructions are marked on the enclosed proxy card, FOR each of the director nominees identified on such proxy card for such directors, as the holder of such shares is entitled to vote. Although management does not know of any matter other than the proposal described above to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting, unless contrary instructions are given, shares represented by valid proxies will be voted by the persons named on the accompanying proxy card in accordance with their respective best judgment in respect of any other matters that may properly be presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting.

Execution of a proxy will not in any way affect a stockholder’s right to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, and any person giving a proxy has the right to revoke it at any time before it is exercised by: (a) filing with the Secretary of Salem, prior to the commencement of the Annual Meeting, either a duly executed written notice dated subsequent to such proxy revoking the same or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or (b) attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

The mailing address of the principal executive offices of the Company is 4880 Santa Rosa Road, Camarillo, California 93012, and its telephone number is (805) 987-0400.

Record Date, Quorum and Voting

Only stockholders of record on April 9, 2010 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. There were outstanding on the Record Date 18,244,131 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Class A common stock”), and 5,553,696 shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Class B common stock”) (the Class A common stock and the Class B common stock are collectively referred to as the “common stock”). Each share of outstanding Class A common stock is entitled to one vote on each matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting and each share of outstanding Class B common stock is entitled to ten votes on each matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, except that, as provided in the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the holders of Class A common stock shall be entitled to vote as a class, exclusive of the holders of the Class B common stock, to elect two “Independent Directors.” The two Independent Directors shall be elected by a majority of the votes of the shares of Class A common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the election of the Independent

1

Table of Contents

Directors; the remaining five directors will be elected by a majority of the votes of the shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the election of such directors. For information regarding the election of the Independent Directors, see the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS.”

The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. In the event there are not sufficient shares for a quorum at the time of the Annual Meeting, the Annual Meeting may be adjourned in order to permit the further solicitation of proxies.

Only votes cast in person at the Annual Meeting or received by proxy before the beginning of the Annual Meeting will be counted. Giving us your proxy means you authorize us to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting in the manner you direct. If your shares are held in your name, you can vote by proxy in three convenient ways as follows:

Telephone and Internet voting facilities for stockholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. on June 1, 2010.

Under Delaware law and the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, abstentions and broker non-votes are counted for the purpose of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business. With regard to the election of directors, votes may be cast in favor of or against any particular director nominee. Any stockholder proposals that properly come before the Annual Meeting require, in general, the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock present, in person or represented by proxy, at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the subject matter. For Proposal 1, abstentions will be counted in tabulations of the votes cast on a proposal and will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal, whereas broker non-votes will not be counted for purposes of determining whether the proposal has been approved. If you hold shares of our common stock through a broker, bank or other nominee, then you hold shares in street name. Thus, you must instruct the broker, bank or other nominee as to how to vote your shares. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), if you do not provide such instructions, the firm that holds your shares will have discretionary authority to vote your shares with respect to “routine” matters. As a result of recent changes to NYSE rules, the election of the board of directors is not considered a “routine” matter. Thus, your broker will not have discretionary authority to vote your shares in connection with Proposal 1 if you do not provide it with instructions.

Electronic Access to Proxy Materials

Pursuant to applicable United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rules, the Company is making this proxy statement and its Annual Report on Form 10-K available to its stockholders electronically via the Internet at http://bnymellon.mobular.net/bnymellon/salm. On or about April 23, 2010, we mailed our stockholders a Notice containing instructions on how to access this proxy statement along with our Annual Report on Form 10-K as well as instructions on how to vote online. If you received this Notice by mail, you will not automatically receive a printed copy of the proxy statement and annual report. The Notice also instructs you on how you may submit your proxy vote securely over the Internet or by telephone. If you received a Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials as set forth in the Notice.

2

Table of Contents

Solicitation

The cost of preparing, assembling and sending the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, this Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy card will be paid by the Company. Following the delivery of this Proxy Statement, directors, officers and other employees of the Company may solicit proxies by mail, telephone, facsimile or other electronic means or by personal interview. Such persons will receive no additional compensation for such services. Brokerage houses and other nominees, fiduciaries and custodians nominally holding shares of Class A common stock of record will be requested to forward proxy soliciting material to the beneficial owners of such shares, and will be reimbursed by the Company for their reasonable charges and expenses in connection therewith.

Householding

With regard to the delivery of Annual Reports and Proxy Statements, under certain circumstances the SEC permits a single set of such documents to be sent to any household at which two or more stockholders reside if they appear to be members of the same family. Each stockholder, however, still receives a separate proxy card. This procedure, known as “householding,” reduces the amount of duplicate information received at a household and reduces delivery and printing costs as well. A number of banks, brokers and other firms have instituted householding and have previously sent a notice to that effect to certain of the Company’s stockholders whose shares are registered in the name of such bank, broker or other firm. As a result, unless the stockholders receiving such notice gave contrary instructions, only one Annual Report and/or Proxy Statement, as applicable, will be delivered to an address at which two or more stockholders reside. If any stockholder residing at such an address wishes to receive a separate Annual Report or Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting or for future stockholder meetings, such stockholder should telephone toll-free 1-800-542-1061, or write to Salem Communications Corporation c/o BNY Mellon Shareowner Services, P.O. Box 358015, Pittsburgh, PA 15252-8015. A separate set of proxy materials relating to the Annual Meeting will be sent promptly following receipt of your request. In addition, if any stockholder who previously consented to householding desires to receive a separate copy of a Proxy Statement or Annual Report, as applicable, for each stockholder at his or her same address, such stockholder should contact his or her bank, broker or other firm in whose name the shares are registered or contact the Company at the address or telephone number listed on page 1 of this Proxy Statement. Similarly, a stockholder may use any of these methods if such stockholder is receiving multiple copies of a Proxy Statement or Annual Report and would prefer to receive a single copy in the future.

3

Table of Contents

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Board of Directors

The board of directors presently consists of seven members. The following table sets forth certain information as of April 9, 2010, except where otherwise indicated, with respect to the directors of the Company. Each of the directors of the Company serves a one-year term and all directors are subject to re-election at each annual meeting of stockholders.

Board Composition

As a national media presence focused on the Christian and family themed audience and the conservative news talk audience, our business involves an operational structure that operates on a broad scale and encompasses research, technical developments, and marketing functions in a context characterized by rapidly evolving technologies, exposure to business cycles, and significant competition. The Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing and assessing with the board the appropriate skills, experience, and background sought of board members in the context of our business and the then-current membership on the board. This assessment of board skills, experience, and background includes numerous diverse factors, such as understanding of and experience in radio and new media; understanding of our audience and the ministries that serve them; and finance, marketing and advertising experience. The priorities and emphasis of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and of the board with regard to these factors may change from time to time to take into account changes in the Company’s business and other trends, as well as the portfolio of skills and experience of current and prospective board members. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the board will review and assess the continued relevance of and emphasis on these factors as part of the board’s annual self-assessment process and in connection with candidate searches to determine if they are effective in helping to satisfy the board’s goal of creating and sustaining a board that can appropriately support and oversee the Company’s activities.

We believe that it is important for our board members to have diverse backgrounds, skills and experiences and seek such diversity in nominating director candidates. One goal of this diversity of backgrounds, skills and experience is to assist the board in its oversight concerning our business and operations. We consider the key skills, qualifications and experience listed below as important for our directors to have in light of our current business and structure. The directors’ biographies provided later in this Proxy Statement note each director’s relevant skills, qualifications and experience.

4

Table of Contents

Set forth below is certain information concerning the principal occupation and business experience of each of the directors during the past five years and other relevant experience.

Stuart W. Epperson

Mr. Epperson has been Chairman of the Board of the Company since its inception. He is also a director of Salem Communications Holding Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Mr. Epperson has been engaged in the ownership and operation of radio stations since 1961. Mr. Epperson has been a member of the board of directors of the National Religious Broadcasters for a number of years; he was re-elected to a three-year term on that board in February 2007. Mr. Epperson is married to Nancy A. Epperson who is Mr. Atsinger’s sister.

As co-founder of the Company, Mr. Epperson provides the board with extensive and valuable radio and senior executive leadership experience and insight into the background and vision of the Company. His past political experience as well as his continuing operation of radio stations for related businesses provide the board with valuable relevant experience with the needs and goals of our audience and our programmers and enable Mr. Epperson to contribute to the board by assessing the many and varied strategic opportunities presented to the Company.

5

Table of Contents

Edward G. Atsinger III

Mr. Atsinger has been Chief Executive Officer, a director of the Company and a director of each of the Company’s subsidiaries since their inception. He was President of Salem from its inception through June 2007. He has been engaged in the ownership and operation of radio stations since 1969. Mr. Atsinger has been a member of the board of directors of the National Religious Broadcasters for a number of years; he was re-elected to a three-year term on that board in February 2007. He was elected to a two-year term on the board of directors of the National Broadcasters Association in 2008. Mr. Atsinger has also been a member of the board of directors of Oaks Christian School since 1999. Mr. Atsinger is the brother-in-law of Mr. Epperson.

As co-founder of the Company, Mr. Atsinger provides the board with extensive and valuable radio and senior executive leadership experience and insight into the background and vision of the Company. His longstanding association with and service on many broadcasting-related boards of directors over the years also provides valuable radio and new media experience as well as an understanding of the broader needs and challenges facing our industry.

David Davenport

Mr. Davenport has been a director of the Company since November 2001. Mr. Davenport is Counselor to the Director of the Hoover Institution (since 2008) and a Research Fellow (since 2001). He was a Distinguished Professor of Public Policy at Pepperdine University from 2003 to 2008. Mr. Davenport was the Chief Executive Officer of Starwire Corporation, a software service company formerly known as Christianity.com, from June 2000 to May 2001. Mr. Davenport served as President of Pepperdine University from 1985 to 2000 and from 1980 through 1985 he served as a Professor of Law, General Counsel, and Executive Vice President of the University. Mr. Davenport currently serves on the boards of Forest Lawn Memorial Parks Association and Common Sense California. Mr. Davenport also serves on the board of directors of Ameron International Corporation.

As a scholar, educator, executive and researcher, Mr. Davenport brings to the board valuable senior executive experience, new media experience, public company board experience, and legal expertise.

Roland S. Hinz

Mr. Hinz has been a director of the Company since September 1997. Mr. Hinz has been the owner, President and Editor-in-Chief of Hi-Torque Publishing Company, a publisher of magazines covering the motorcycling and biking industries, since 1982. Mr. Hinz is also the managing member of Hi-Favor Broadcasting, LLC, the licensee of radio stations KLTX-AM, Long Beach, California, and KEZY-AM, San Bernardino, California (which were acquired from the Company in August 2000 and December 2001, respectively), and radio station KSDO-AM, San Diego, California. Mr. Hinz also serves on the board of directors of the Association for Community Education, Inc. a not-for-profit corporation operating Spanish Christian radio stations in California. Mr. Hinz also serves on the board of directors of Truth for Life, a non-profit organization that is a customer of the Company.

Mr. Hinz’s qualifications to serve on the board include his extensive business experience, skills and acumen reflected in his senior executive management experience as president and editor-in-chief of a large publishing company. He also has served as a board member for several not-for-profit organizations, enabling him to bring valuable cross-board experience as well as relevant experience with our audience and programmers.

Paul Pressler

Mr. Pressler has been a director of the Company since March 2002, and is also a board member of: the Free Market Foundation; KHCB Network, a non-profit corporation which owns Christian radio stations in Texas and Louisiana; Criswell College, which owns Christian radio stations in Texas; and the National Religious

6

Table of Contents

Broadcasters. He has been an active leader in the Southern Baptist Convention and has served as its First Vice President. Additionally, he is a member of the Texas Philosophical Society and on the boards of various non-profit organizations. Since 1995, Mr. Pressler has been a partner in the law firm of Woodfill & Pressler and its predecessors. A retired justice of the Texas Court of Appeals, Mr. Pressler was appointed Justice of the Texas Court of Appeals in 1978, serving until 1992. Mr. Pressler also served as District Judge from 1970 to 1978. From 1958 to 1970, he was associated with the law firm of Vinson & Elkins. From 1957 to 1959, he was a member of the Texas Legislature, House of Representatives.

As a former judge, Mr. Pressler provides the board with valuable analytical and consensus building skills. His extensive experience with Christian organizations and non-profit entities enables Mr. Pressler to keenly understand the needs of our programmers and audience. Mr. Pressler’s legal expertise enables him to provide perspective and oversight with regard to the company’s legal and compliance matters, and his board service with numerous other companies provides cross-board experience.

Richard A. Riddle

Mr. Riddle has been a director of the Company since September 1997. Mr. Riddle is an independent businessman specializing in providing financial assistance and consulting to individuals and manufacturing companies. He was President and majority stockholder of I. L. Walker Company from 1988 to 1997 when that company was sold. He also was Chief Operating Officer and a major stockholder of Richter Manufacturing Corp. from 1970 to 1987.

Having an extensive career in financial matters, Mr. Riddle brings to the Board significant financial experience enabling him to assess and provide oversight concerning business and financial matters addressed by the Company.

Dennis M. Weinberg

Mr. Weinberg has been director of the Company since November 1, 2005. Mr. Weinberg was one of the founding directors for WellPoint, a health benefits company. From February of 2002 to May 2006, Mr. Weinberg served as President and Chief Executive Officer for ARCUS Enterprises, a WellPoint business development subsidiary. Previously, Mr. Weinberg served for nearly 20 years in a variety of CEO, Group President, and Executive Vice President positions with WellPoint and its various affiliates. Prior to WellPoint, Mr. Weinberg held a variety of business consulting positions with the accounting firm of Touche-Ross and Company (currently Deloitte & Touche) in Chicago. Before that, he was general manager for the CTX Products Division of Pet, Inc. at the time, an I.C. Industries Company in St. Louis, Missouri, a designer and manufacturer of commercial computerized processing equipment. Mr. Weinberg also serves as a board member and chairman of the audit committee for Dole Food Company (NYSE: Dole) since November 2009. Mr. Weinberg is a General Member of the development companies of FRWII, LLC, SkyView Development, LLC and KNIC, LLC. He is the co-founder of Cornerstone Network Associates, Life Skills for American Families, and is an advisor for the Pacific Justice Institute. Mr. Weinberg served on the board of directors of Truth for Life from November 2003 to September 2007. Truth for Life is a non-profit organization that is a customer of the Company.

Mr. Weinberg has significant executive experience with the strategic, financial, and operational requirements of large research and manufacturing-oriented organizations, and brings to our board senior executive leadership and financial experience. In addition, having served as CEO of health care companies, he has substantial experience in dealing with research and development efforts and technological innovation, which has provided him with insight into the challenges and fast-moving developments of new media. As a director of another public company board, including serving as its audit committee chair, Mr. Weinberg also provides public company cross-board experience.

7

Table of Contents

Director Independence and Executive Sessions

The Company’s board of directors evaluated the independence of each of the Company’s directors pursuant to the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ Rules”). During this review, and as more specifically described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS”, below, the board of directors considered various transactions and relationships among directors (and their affiliates or family members), members of the Company’s senior management, affiliates and subsidiaries of the Company and certain other parties that occurred during the past three fiscal years. This review was conducted to determine whether, under the NASDAQ Rules, any such relationships or transactions would affect the board of directors’ determination as to each director’s independence from management.

Upon conclusion of this review, the board of directors determined that, of the directors nominated for election at the Annual Meeting, a majority of the board (comprised of Messrs. Davenport, Hinz, Pressler, Riddle and Weinberg) is independent of the Company and its senior management as required by the NASDAQ Rules.

The NASDAQ Rules also require that independent members of the board of directors meet periodically in executive sessions during which only independent directors are present. The Company’s independent directors have met separately in such executive sessions and in the future will regularly meet in executive sessions as required by the NASDAQ Rules.

Committees of the Board of Directors

The Company’s board of directors has three committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The following table identifies the independent members of the board of directors and lists the members and chairman of each of these committees:

I = Director is independent

X = Current member of committee

C = Current member and chairman of the committee

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee currently consists of Messrs. Weinberg (Chairman), Hinz and Riddle, each of whom is independent under the NASDAQ Rules and applicable SEC rules and regulations. The board of directors has determined that Mr. Weinberg, the Audit Committee Chairperson, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined and required by applicable SEC rules and regulations.

The Audit Committee held four regularly-scheduled meetings and two special meetings in 2009 and operates under a written charter adopted by the board of directors. The Audit Committee and the Company’s board of directors annually (or more often as needed) review the charter to ensure it conforms to current laws and practices. This charter is available on the Company’s Internet website (www.salem.cc) and a copy of the charter

8

Table of Contents

may be obtained upon written request from the Secretary of the Company. Any information found on the Company’s website is not a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this or any other report of the Company filed with, or furnished to, the SEC .

The Audit Committee’s responsibilities are generally to assist the board of directors in fulfilling its legal and fiduciary responsibilities relating to accounting, audit and reporting policies and practices of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Audit Committee also, among other things, oversees the Company’s financial reporting process, retains and engages the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, approves the fees for the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, monitors and reviews the quality, activities and functions of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, and monitors the adequacy of the Company’s operating and internal controls and procedures as reported by management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee Report set forth later in this Proxy Statement provides additional details about the duties and activities of this committee.

Compensation Committee

As provided under applicable laws and rules, the Company’s board of directors delegates authority for compensation matters to the Compensation Committee of the board of directors. The Compensation Committee’s membership is determined by the board of directors. The Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Davenport (Chairman), Hinz and Riddle, each of whom is independent under the NASDAQ Rules. The Compensation Committee is authorized to review and approve compensation, including non-cash benefits, and severance arrangements for the Company’s Section 16 officers and employees and to approve salaries, remuneration and other forms of additional compensation and benefits as it deems necessary. The Compensation Committee also administers the Company’s Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Plan”).

The Compensation Committee held three regularly scheduled and three special meetings in 2009. The Compensation Committee meets at least twice annually and at additional times as are necessary or advisable to fulfill all of its duties and responsibilities.

The role of the Company’s Compensation Committee is to oversee the Company’s compensation and benefit plans and policies, administer the Stock Plan (including reviewing and approving equity grants to elected officers), and review and approve all compensation decisions relating to elected officers, including those for the Company’s Named Executive Officers. In 2009, the actions of the Compensation Committee included: reviewing objective benchmarks and metrics by which a Named Executive Officer’s performance can be measured; and analyzing peer compensation and performance data for comparison with the Company’s Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee has delegated limited authority to Edward G. Atsinger III, the Company’s Chief Executive officer, to grant up to ten thousand (10,000) options during any calendar year period to purchase the Company’s class A common stock. This delegated authority is subject to prompt notification to the Compensation Committee of the issuance of any such grants and ratification of any such grants at the next regularly scheduled Compensation Committee meeting following the date of such grants.

The Company’s Named Executive Officers do not determine or approve any element or component of their own compensation. The Company’s CEO provides a recommendation to the Compensation Committee for base salary and annual incentive compensation for the Named Executive Officers reporting to him.

The Compensation Committee operates pursuant to a charter that was approved by the board of directors. The charter sets forth the responsibilities of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee and the Company’s board of directors annually (or more often as needed) review the charter to ensure it conforms to current laws and practices. This charter is available on the Company’s Internet website (www.salem.cc) and a copy of the charter may be obtained from the Secretary of the Company upon written request. Any information found on the Company’s website is not a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this or any other report of the Company filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.

9

Table of Contents

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of Messrs. Pressler (Chairman), Davenport, Hinz, Riddle and Weinberg, each of whom is independent under the NASDAQ Rules. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held two regularly scheduled meetings in 2009.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is authorized to: (a) develop and recommend a set of corporate governance standards to the board of directors for adoption and implementation, (b) identify individuals qualified to become members of the board of directors, (c) recommend that director nominees be elected at the Company’s next annual meeting of stockholders, (d) recommend nominees to serve on each standing committee of the board of directors, (e) lead in the annual review of board performance and evaluation of the board’s effectiveness, (f) ensure that succession planning takes place for the position of chief executive officer and other key Company senior management positions, and (g) analyze, review and, where appropriate, approve all related party transactions to which the Company or its subsidiaries or affiliates are a party, all in accordance with applicable rules and regulations.

To qualify as a nominee for service on the board of directors, a candidate must have sufficient time and resources available to successfully carry out the duties required of a Company board member. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee desires to attract and retain highly qualified directors who will diligently execute their responsibilities and enhance their knowledge of the Company’s core businesses and seeks directors who possess some or all of the skills, qualifications and experience described under “Board Composition” in this Proxy Statement.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee implements the Company’s policy regarding stockholder nominations by considering nominees for director positions that are made by the Company’s stockholders. Any stockholder desiring to make such a nomination must submit in writing the name(s) of the recommended nominee(s) to the Secretary of the Company at least 90 days before the annual meeting of stockholders. The written submission must also contain biographical information about the proposed nominee, a description of the nominee’s qualifications to serve as a member of the board of directors, and evidence of the nominee’s valid consent to serve as a director of the Company if nominated and duly elected.

The Company’s directors provide oversight of the Company’s management and play a key role in shaping the strategic direction of the Company. Consistent with the Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Charter, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers various criteria in board candidates, including, the skills, qualifications and experience described under “Board Composition” in this Proxy Statement, as well as their appreciation of the Company’s core purpose, core values, and whether they have time available to devote to board activities. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers whether a potential nominee would satisfy:

Whenever a vacancy exists on the board due to expansion of the board’s size or the resignation or retirement of an existing director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies and evaluates potential director nominees. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers recommendations of management, stockholders and others. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has sole authority to retain and terminate any search firm to be used to identify director candidates, including approving its fees and other retention terms.

Director candidates are evaluated using the criteria described above and in light of the then-existing composition of the board, including its overall size, structure, backgrounds and areas of expertise of existing directors and the relative mix of independent and employee directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers the specific needs of the various board committees. The Nominating and

10

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Committee recommends potential director nominees to the full board, and final approval of a candidate for nomination is determined by the full board. This evaluation process is the same for director nominees who are recommended by our stockholders.

The board of directors has adopted a written charter for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Company’s board of directors annually (or more often as needed) review the charter to ensure it conforms to current laws and practices. This charter is available on the Company’s Internet website (www.salem.cc) and a copy of the charter may be obtained upon written request from the Secretary of the Company. Any information found on the Company’s website is not a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this or any other report of the Company filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee did not receive any recommendations from stockholders proposing candidate(s) for election at the 2010 Annual Meeting. None of the directors serving on the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, or the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are employees of the Company.

Although the board does not have a formal policy on diversity, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the board review from time-to-time the membership of the board in light of the Company’s operations and strategic objectives and consider whether the current board members possess the requisite skills, experience and perspectives to oversee the achievement of those goals.

Board Leadership Structure

Historically, the Company’s board of directors has had a general policy that the positions of Chairman of the board and CEO should be held by separate persons as an aid in the board’s oversight of management. This policy has been in effect since the Company began operations. The Chairman is a full-time senior executive of the Company. The duties of the Chairman of the board include:

The board of directors believes that there may be advantages to having a separate Chairman for matters such as communications and relations between the board members, the CEO, and other senior management; in assisting the board in reaching consensus on particular strategies and policies; and in facilitating robust director, board, and CEO evaluation processes. In addition, having separate Chairman and CEO positions permits the CEO to focus on day-to-day business and allows the Chairman to lead the board in its oversight responsibilities. The board currently consists of the Chairman of the board, Mr. Epperson, the Company’s CEO, Mr. Atsinger, and 5 independent directors. One of Mr. Epperson’s roles is to oversee and manage the board of directors and its functions, including setting meeting agendas and running board meetings. In this regard, Mr. Epperson and the board in their advisory and oversight roles are particularly focused on assisting the CEO and senior management in seeking and adopting successful business strategies and risk management policies, and in making successful choices in management succession.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Company’s board of directors as a whole has responsibility for risk oversight, with reviews of certain areas being conducted by the relevant board committees. These committees then provide reports to the full board. The oversight responsibility of the board and its committees is enabled by management reporting processes that

11

Table of Contents

are designed to provide visibility to the board about the identification, assessment, and management of critical risks. These areas of focus include strategic, operational, financial and reporting, succession and compensation, legal and compliance, and other risks. The board and its committees oversee risks associated with their respective areas of responsibility, as summarized above.

Director Attendance at Board Meetings and 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

The full board of directors held five regularly-scheduled meetings in 2009. During 2009, each of the Company’s incumbent directors attended (either in person or telephonically) all of the regularly-scheduled meetings of the full board of directors and all meetings of the committees of the board of directors on which they served. The Company encourages, but does not require, that each director attend the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders. In 2009, each of the Company’s directors attended the 2009 annual meeting of stockholders.

Communications between Stockholders and the Board

The Company has historically handled communications between stockholders and the board of directors on an ad hoc basis. No formal policy or process for such communications has been adopted by the Company as of the date of this Proxy Statement. The Company has, however, taken actions to ensure that the views of its stockholders are communicated to the board or one or more of its individual directors, as applicable. The board considers its responsiveness to such communications as timely and exemplary.

Financial Code of Conduct

The Company has adopted a Financial Code of Conduct that applies to each director of the Company, the Company’s CEO, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller and persons performing similar functions. This Financial Code of Conduct has been adopted by the board as a “code of ethics” that satisfies applicable NASDAQ Rules. The Financial Code of Conduct is available on the Company’s Internet website (www.salem.cc) and a copy of the code may be obtained free of charge upon written request from the Secretary of the Company. Any information found on the Company’s website is not a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this or any other report of the Company filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.

Executive Officers

Set forth below are the executive officers of the Company, together with the positions held by those persons as of April 9, 2009. The executive officers are elected annually and serve at the pleasure of the Company’s board of directors; however, the Company has entered into Employment Agreements with Messrs. Epperson, Atsinger, Davis, Evans, Henderson and Masyr, which agreements are described under the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION” below.

12

Table of Contents

Set forth below is certain information concerning the business experience during the past five years and other relevant experience of each of the individuals named above (excluding Messrs. Atsinger and Epperson, whose business experience is described in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS—Board of Directors” above).

Joe D. Davis

Mr. Davis is currently the Company’s Senior Advisor to the CEO, Special Projects and Strategic Development. Mr. Davis served as the Company’s President—Radio Division of the Company from July 2007 through December 31, 2009. Mr. Davis was the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from March 2005 to July 2007. Prior to that time, he was Executive Vice President of Radio from 2003 until March 2005, Executive Vice President, Operations from 2001 to 2003, Senior Vice President of the Company from 2000 to 2001, Vice President, Operations of the Company from 1996 to 2000 and General Manager of WMCA-AM from 1989 to 1996. He served concurrently as General Manager of WWDJ-AM from 1994 to 1996. Previously he was President of Davis Eaton Corporation in Phoenix, Arizona and also served as Vice President and Executive Director of one of the Company’s national ministry clients. He has been involved professionally in various aspects of broadcasting since 1967.

David Santrella

Mr. Santrella was promoted to President, Radio Division of the Company effective January 1, 2010. From October 2008 to December 31, 2009, he served as Operational Vice President over the Company’s Minneapolis, Denver and Colorado Springs clusters in addition to his existing responsibility over the Chicago cluster. From March 2006 to October 2008, Mr. Santrella was the Operational Vice President of Chicago and Milwaukee. In November of 2003, he was given additional oversight responsibility of Milwaukee. Mr. Santrella started with the Company in 2001 as the General Manager of the Company’s Chicago cluster.

David A. R. Evans

Mr. Evans has been President—New Business Development, Interactive and Publishing of the Company since July 2007. Mr. Evans was Executive Vice President—Business Development and Chief Financial Officer of the Company from September 2005 to June 2007. Mr. Evans was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from September 2003 to September 2005. From 2000 to 2003, Mr. Evans served as the Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. From 1997 to 2000, Mr. Evans served as Senior Vice President and Managing Director-Europe, Middle East, and Africa of Warner Bros. Consumer Products in London, England. He also served at Warner Bros. Consumer Products in Los Angeles, California, as Senior Vice President-Latin America, International Marketing, Business Development from 1996 to 1997 and Vice President-Worldwide Finance, Operations, and Business Development from 1992 to 1996. From 1990 to 1992, he served as Regional Financial Controller-Europe for Warner Bros. based in London, England. Prior to 1990, Mr. Evans was an audit manager with Ernst & Young LLP in Los Angeles, California and worked as a U.K. Chartered Accountant for Ernst & Young in London, England.

Christopher J. Henderson

Mr. Henderson has been Vice President, Legal and Human Resources, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of the Company since March 2008. Mr. Henderson was Vice President, Human Resources of the Company from August 2006 to February 2008. From 2001 to August 2006, Mr. Henderson served as Corporate Counsel of the Company. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Henderson worked for 13 years as Senior Associate Attorney for Cooksey, Toolen, Gage, Duffy & Woog, first as a trial attorney and then as a transactional attorney.

13

Table of Contents

Evan D. Masyr

Mr. Masyr has been Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since July 2007. Mr. Masyr was Vice President—Accounting and Finance of the Company from September 2005 to June 2007. From March 2004 to September 2005, Mr. Masyr was Vice President of Accounting and Corporate Controller of the Company. Prior to that time, Mr. Masyr was Vice President and Corporate Controller of the Company from January 2003 to March 2004. From February 2000 to December 2002, he served as the Company’s Controller. From 1993 to February 2000, Mr. Masyr worked for PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (formerly, Coopers & Lybrand LLP). Mr. Masyr has been a Certified Public Accountant since 1995.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The table below summarizes the total compensation paid to or earned by the Named Executive Officers for the Company’s fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

14

Table of Contents

15

Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2009, in respect of outstanding equity awards made to the Company’s NEOs that are exercisable into the Company’s Class A common stock that may be issued under the Stock Plan, the Company’s only existing equity compensation plan.

Material Terms of Company’s Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan

The Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan as a benefit for certain designated employees who are within a select group of key management or highly compensated employees. The primary purpose of the Company’s non-qualified deferred compensation plan is to allow plan participants to defer payment of up to 100% of base salary and bonus compensation until retirement or other employment termination. Plan participants may also elect an in-service distribution during a designated calendar year. Payment is made, at the participant’s election, in a single sum or equal annual installment payments over a five-year period commencing at: (a) retirement after age 60, (b) or one year thereafter, or (c) the date previously elected by the plan participant; provided, however, that distribution in a single sum is automatically made on termination of employment for reasons other than retirement or disability. Previously established plan payment dates may, under certain circumstances, be deferred by participants but such payment dates may not be voluntarily accelerated after they have been designated by a participant. Plan participants may elect to have their contributions in investments that are offered to all plan participants by the plan administrator. Plan accounts are 100% vested at all times. The plan constitutes a fully funded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan.

Material Terms of NEO Employment Agreements Providing For Payment to NEOs upon Termination or Change in Control

Mr. Atsinger’s and Mr. Epperson’s Employment Agreements

Under the terms of their employment agreements, if Mr. Atsinger’s or Mr. Epperson’s employment is terminated by reason of death, his estate is entitled to receive: (a) a payment equal to his base salary through the date of termination to the extent not already paid, (b) a prorated portion of his incentive bonus based on his prior year’s incentive bonus, (c) his actual earned incentive bonus for any period not already paid, (d) amounts to

16

Table of Contents

which he is entitled under the Company’s benefit plans, (e) immediate, 100% vesting of outstanding unvested stock options and other equity-based awards, and (f) continued coverage of his dependants by the Company’s health benefit plans for a period of twelve months.

If Mr. Atsinger’s or Mr. Epperson’s employment is terminated upon disability (as defined in his employment agreement), he is entitled to receive: (a) a payment equal to his base salary through the date of termination to the extent not already paid, (b) a severance payment equal to 100% of his then current annual base salary for a period of fifteen (15) months, (c) a prorated portion of his incentive bonus based on his prior year’s incentive bonus, (d) his actual earned incentive bonus for any period not already paid, (e) amounts to which he is entitled under the Company’s benefit plans, and (f) immediate, 100% vesting of outstanding unvested stock options and other equity-based awards.

If Mr. Atsinger’s or Mr. Epperson’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause (as defined in his employment agreement), he is entitled to receive: (a) a payment equal to his base salary earned but unpaid through the date of termination, (b) a prorated portion of his incentive bonus based on the prior year’s incentive bonus, and any incentive bonus amount earned but not yet paid, and, (c) a payment equal to his then current annual base salary for a period of six months.

With the exception of any continued benefits coverage in the event of the death of Mr. Epperson or Mr. Atsinger, all payments to be made by the Company upon termination of employment to Messrs. Epperson or Atsinger will be lump sum payments.

The employment agreements also contain provisions that: (a) grant the Company a right of first refusal on all corporate opportunities presented to Messrs. Atsinger and Epperson; (b) restrict Mr. Atsinger’s and Mr. Epperson’s ability to engage in any business that is competitive with the Company’s business for a period of two years following retirement or termination for cause or without good reason; and (c) restrict Mr. Atsinger’s and Mr. Epperson’s ability to interfere with the business of the Company or solicit Company employees for a period of two years following such retirement or termination. Compliance by Messrs. Atsinger and Epperson with these obligations is a material condition to the Company’s obligation to provide the above termination benefits.

Employment Agreement With Mr. Evans

Under the terms of his employment agreement, if Mr. Evans’ employment is terminated by reason of death, disability or otherwise for cause (as defined in his employment agreement), he or his estate is entitled to receive: (a) a payment equal to his base salary through the date of termination to the extent not already paid, and (b) his actual earned incentive bonus for any period not already paid.

In addition, if Mr. Evans’ employment is terminated without cause (as defined in his employment agreement), certain stock option awards made to Mr. Evans on December 21, 2001, shall have an accelerated vesting schedule (with such options ratably vesting at a rate of 12.5% per year commencing on December 21, 2002 rather than ratably vesting at a rate of 25% per year commencing on December 21, 2005) and the unexercised portion of such options, based upon the accelerated vesting schedule, shall expire and become unexercisable one year from the termination date.

If Mr. Evans’ employment is terminated by the Company without cause (as defined in his employment agreement), he is also entitled to receive: (a) a payment equal to his base salary earned but unpaid through the date of termination, (b) his actual earned incentive bonus for any period not already paid, (c) a severance payment in an amount equal to the base salary Mr. Evans would have otherwise received for a period of nine (9) months from the date of termination had he remained employed with the Company, and (d) professional outplacement assistance for twelve consecutive months from the termination date.

17

Table of Contents

With the exception of professional outplacement services that would be provided by the Company to Mr. Evans over a one-year period in the event of a termination without cause, all payments to be made by the Company upon termination of employment to Mr. Evans would be lump sum payments.

The employment agreement with Mr. Evans also contains a provision that restricts his ability to interfere with the business of the Company or solicit Company employees for a period of six months following termination of employment for any reason. Compliance by Mr. Evans with these obligations is a material condition to the Company’s obligation to provide the above termination benefits.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2009, with respect to shares of our Class A common stock that may be issued under the Company’s Stock Plan, our only existing equity compensation plan. The Stock Plan was adopted by our board of directors and approved by our stockholders on May 25, 1999. On March 20, 2003, the board of directors approved an amendment to the Stock Plan to reserve an additional 600,000 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock for issuance under the Stock Plan. The amendment was approved by a vote of the stockholders at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders held on June 11, 2003. On November 10, 2004 the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to the Stock Plan to reserve an additional 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock for issuance under the Stock Plan. The amendment was approved by a vote of the stockholders at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 18, 2005. On June 3, 2009, by a vote of the stockholders at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders, an extension of the term of the Stock Plan through May 25, 2019 was approved.

18

Table of Contents

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Non-employee directors of the Company receive an annual retainer and fees. The following table sets forth the compensation earned by the Company’s non-employee directors in 2009:

19

Table of Contents

The cash compensation paid as of December 31, 2009 to the Company’s non-employee directors (“Designated Directors”) as approved by the Company’s board of directors at the recommendation of the Committee is as follows:

In addition to the above fees, directors are compensated on an ad hoc basis for special committee or subcommittee meetings held or tasks performed by a committee or subcommittee designated by either the full Board of Directors or by a standing committee of the full Board of Directors, with such compensation determined by the establishing body at the time the special committee or subcommittee is established. Designated Directors who are also chairmen of the Company’s board committees shall receive the applicable chairperson fee in addition to a committee attendance fee for each regularly scheduled Company board committee meeting. Designated Directors shall also receive reimbursement for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with travel to and attendance at regularly scheduled Company board and board committee meetings.

Company directors who are also employees of the Company (Stuart W. Epperson, Chairman of the Board, and Edward G. Atsinger III, CEO) are not additionally compensated for their services as directors. Compensation for Messrs. Epperson and Atsinger is summarized in the “Summary Compensation Table” appearing in this Prospectus under the heading “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.”

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

This Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed soliciting material or to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), nor shall any information in this report be incorporated by reference by any general statement into any past or future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that Salem Communications Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Corporation”) specifically incorporates this information by reference into such filing, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

The purpose of the Audit Committee (the “Committee”) is to oversee, on behalf of the entire board of directors (the “Board”): (a) the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Corporation, (b) the audits of the Corporation’s financial statements, (c) the qualifications of the public accounting firm engaged as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm to prepare or issue an audit report on the financial statements of the Corporation, and (d) the performance of the Corporation’s internal auditor and independent registered public accounting firm.

20

Table of Contents

The Committee has adopted, and annually reviews, a charter outlining the practices it follows. The charter complies with all current regulatory requirements, including requirements pertaining to the NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards definitions, provisions and applicable exceptions concerning the independence of audit committee members.

In 2009, the Committee held six meetings, four of which were regularly scheduled and two of which were special. The Committee’s meeting agendas are established by the Committee chairman based upon the Committee’s charter and an annual meeting planner approved by the entire Committee. At each of these meetings, the Committee met with the senior members of the Corporation’s financial management team and General Counsel. Additionally, the Corporation’s internal auditor met with the full Committee at five of the six meetings and the independent registered public accounting firm met with the full Committee at five of the six meetings. Prior to each regularly scheduled meeting, the Chairman of the Committee also met privately with the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm and, separately, with the Corporation’s internal auditor, at which times candid discussions of financial management, accounting and internal control issues took place.

The Committee appointed SingerLewak LLP as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2009, and reviewed with the Corporation’s financial managers, the independent registered public accounting firm, and the Corporation’s internal auditor, overall audit scopes and plans, the results of internal and external controls and the quality of the Corporation’s financial reporting.

The Corporation’s management is primarily responsible for the preparation, presentation, and integrity of the Corporation’s financial statements, accounting and financial reporting principles, internal controls, and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards, applicable laws, and regulations. As the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm, SingerLewak LLP is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards and for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the audited financial statements to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Corporation’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009. The Committee has also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by: (a) the Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) in Rule 3200T, and (b) Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Regulation S-X, Rule 2-07.

The Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by PCAOB Rule 3526 (“Communications with Audit Committees Concerning Independence”), and the Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm that firm’s independence from the Corporation and its management. The Committee has also considered whether the independent registered public accounting firm’s provision of non-audit services to the Corporation is compatible with the auditor’s independence.

Based on the Committee’s reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements referred to above be included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, to be filed with the SEC.

The Audit Committee is currently comprised of Dennis M. Weinberg, Chairman, Roland S. Hinz and Richard A. Riddle.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Dennis M. Weinberg, Chairman

Roland S. Hinz

Richard A. Riddle

March 9, 2010

21

Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Company’s Class A and Class B common stock as of April 9, 2010 (unless otherwise indicated) by: (a) each person believed by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of either class of the outstanding Class A or Class B common stock; (b) each director; (c) each of the Named Executive Officers; and (c) all directors and executive officers as a group.

22

Table of Contents

23

Table of Contents

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Purchase of Transmitter Sites

Salem’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has a longstanding policy and desire to reduce the number of transactions entered into between the Company and its related parties. In March 2008, as part of a review and evaluation of certain upcoming related party lease option exercises or renewals, the committee determined that is was in the best interest of the Company for it to make an integrated offer to: (a) purchase certain transmitter sites from trusts or partnerships created for the benefit of Messrs. Atsinger and Epperson and their families (the “Principal Stockholders”), and (b) enter into new transmitter site leases for eight (8) existing transmitter sites operated by the Company and leased from the Principal Stockholders.

As a result of this offer, in April 2008, the Company purchased three tower and antenna sites (the “Transmitter Site Purchases”) from the Principal Stockholders as follows:

By purchasing these sites, Salem eliminated approximately $148,000 in annual rental expenses and permanently secured these AM transmitter site locations. Salem also assumed two income-producing lease agreements as a material part of the Transmitter Site Purchases as follows: (a) a diplex agreement at the Seattle-Tacoma, WA site generating current annual rental income of approximately $139,000, and (b) a mobile telephone lease at the Pittsburgh, PA site generating current annual rental income of approximately $26,000.

The purchase price for all three of the Transmitter Site Purchases was paid by Salem in cash at closing. All expenses incurred in connection with securing title insurance, preparation and recording of deeds, and other fees associated with completion of the Transmitter Site Purchases were shared equally by Salem and the Principal Stockholders.

A prerequisite negotiated by Salem as an important condition of the closing of the Transmitter Site Purchases was the entry by Salem into new transmitter site leases for eight (8) existing transmitter sites (the “New Transmitter Site Leases”) operated by Salem and leased from the Principal Stockholders. Seven (7) of these New Transmitter Site Leases replace existing transmitter site leases between Salem and the Principal Stockholders which were either scheduled to expire or had option exercise deadlines in 2009 or 2010. As a result, Salem is not required to renegotiate a new lease or exercise an option on any of its related party leases until 2016.

In order to broadcast an AM radio signal, Salem’s transmitter facilities must be located in areas where the topography and conductivity of the soils is suitable for transmission. In addition, many AM transmitter sites require several towers arrayed at precise locations, each with a large ground radial system, to operate. Securing a site with the requisite characteristics and obtaining necessary permissions to construct a transmission facility can take significant time and money. By entering into these new leases with the Principal Stockholders, Salem was able to secure these difficult-to-relocate AM transmitter sites for at least ten (10) years with an option to extend each of these leases for five (5) years thereafter.

24

Table of Contents

Leases with Principal Stockholders

As of December 31, 2009, Salem leased the studios and tower and antenna sites described in the table below from the Principal Stockholders. All such leases have cost of living adjustments. Based upon management’s assessment and analysis of local market conditions for comparable properties, Salem believes that such leases do not have terms that vary materially from those that would have been available from unaffiliated parties.

Rental expense paid by Salem to Messrs. Atsinger and Epperson or trusts or partnerships created for the benefit of their families for 2009 amounted to approximately $1.2 million. Rental expense paid by Salem to Mr. Atsinger or trusts created for the benefit of his family for 2009 amounted to approximately $0.1 million. Rental expense paid by Salem to Messrs. Atsinger and Epperson or trusts or partnerships created for the benefit of their families for 2008 amounted to approximately $1.3 million. Rental expense paid by Salem to Mr. Atsinger or trusts created for the benefit of his family for 2008 amounted to approximately $0.1 million.

Radio Stations Owned by the Eppersons

During 2007, 2008 and 2009, Nancy A. Epperson, the wife of the Chairman of the Board, Stuart W. Epperson, served as an officer, director and stockholder of several radio broadcasting entities as follows:

25

Table of Contents

The markets in which these radio stations are located are not currently served by stations owned and operated by the Company. Under his employment agreement, Mr. Epperson is required to offer the Company a right of first refusal of opportunities related to our business.

Radio Stations Owned by Mr. Hinz

During 2007, 2008, and 2009, Mr. Hinz, a Salem director, through companies or entities controlled by him, has and continues to operate the following radio stations in Southern California: (a) KLTX-AM, Long Beach, California, and KEZY-AM, San Bernardino, California (which were acquired from the Company in August 2000 and December 2001, respectively); and (b) KSDO-AM, San Diego, California. These radio stations are formatted in Christian Teaching and Talk programming in the Spanish language.

Truth for Life—Mr. Hinz and Mr. Weinberg

Truth for Life is a non-profit organization that is our customer. During 2009, we were paid approximately $2.0 million by Truth for Life. During 2008, we were paid approximately $2.4 million by Truth for Life. Mr. Hinz is an active member of the board of directors of Truth for Life. Mr. Weinberg served on the board of directors of Truth for Life from November 2003 through June 2007.

Split-Dollar Life Insurance

Salem purchased split-dollar life insurance policies for its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in 1997. The aggregate premiums for these policies were $230,000 in each of the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. We are the owner of the policies and are entitled to recover all of the premiums paid on these policies. Salem records an asset based on the lower of the aggregate premiums paid or insurance case surrender value. As of December 31, 2008 and 2009, we recorded an asset of $1.9 million and $2.4 million, respectively. Benefits above and beyond the cumulative premiums paid will accrue to the beneficiary trusts established by each of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

26

Table of Contents

Transportation Services Supplied by Atsinger Aviation

From time to time, Salem rents aircraft from a company that is owned by Edward G. Atsinger III. As approved by the independent members of our board of directors, Salem rents these aircraft on an hourly basis at what we believe are market rates and we use the aircraft for general corporate needs. Total rental expense for these aircraft for 2009 amounted to approximately $135,000. Total rental expense for these aircraft for 2008 amounted to approximately $188,000.

27

Table of Contents

THE COMPANY’S RELATIONSHIP WITH ITS

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table summarizes the fees billed by the Company’s current registered public accounting firm, SingerLewak, LLP (“SL”), and former registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young (“E&Y”), for professional services rendered during fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2008:

Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

In accordance with the Audit Committee’s pre-approval polices and procedures and the requirements of applicable law, all services to be provided by SL are pre-approved by the Audit Committee. Pre-approval includes audit services, audit-related services and other permissible non-audit services. Pre-approval is generally provided by the full Audit Committee for up to a year and is detailed as to the particular defined tasks or scope of work and is subject to a specific budget. In some cases, the Audit Committee has delegated authority to the Chairman of the Audit Committee to pre-approve additional services, and any such pre-approvals granted by the Chairman must then be communicated to the full Audit Committee at or prior to the next scheduled Audit Committee meeting. When assessing whether it is appropriate to engage the independent registered public accounting firm to perform a service, the Audit Committee considers, among other things, whether such services are consistent with the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence and whether such services constitute prohibited non-audit functions under Section 201 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Audit Committee considered the provision of the services listed in the table above by SL and determined that the provision of such services was compatible with maintaining the independence of SL.

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders of the Company will be asked to vote on the election of seven directors. Two nominees are nominated as “Independent Directors” and shall be elected by the holders of Class A common stock as a class, exclusive of all of the holders of Class B common stock. Paul Pressler and David Davenport have been nominated as the Independent Directors. The nominees receiving the highest number of votes of shares entitled to vote for such directors at the Annual Meeting will be elected directors of the Company. To fill these board positions, unless indicated to the contrary, the enclosed proxy will be voted FOR the

28

Table of Contents

nominees listed below, as listed on the enclosed proxy card for whom the stockholder is entitled to vote. All directors elected at the Annual Meeting will be elected to a one-year term and will serve until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in the year 2010 or until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified.

Set forth below are the names of persons nominated by the Company’s board of directors for election as directors at the Annual Meeting:

Stuart W. Epperson

Edward G. Atsinger III

David Davenport

Roland S. Hinz

Paul Pressler

Richard A. Riddle

Dennis M. Weinberg

Your proxy, unless otherwise indicated, will be voted FOR each of the directors for whom you are entitled to vote, that is, as a Class A common stock holder FOR Messrs. Epperson, Atsinger, Davenport, Hinz, Pressler, Riddle and Weinberg; and as a Class B common stock holder FOR Messrs. Epperson, Atsinger, Hinz, Riddle and Weinberg. For a description of the nominees’ principal occupation and business experience during the last five years and present directorships, please see the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS—Board of Directors,” above.

The Company has been advised by each nominee named in this Proxy Statement that he is willing to be named as such herein and is willing to serve as a director if elected. However, if any of the nominees should be unable to serve as a director, the enclosed proxy will be voted in favor of the remainder of those nominees not opposed by the stockholder on such proxy and may be voted for a substitute nominee selected by the board of directors.

Vote Required and Board of Directors’ Recommendation

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting, at which a quorum representing a majority of the voting power of all outstanding shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock is present and entitled to vote, is required to approve Proposal 1. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR PROPOSAL 1.

STOCKHOLDERS’ PROPOSALS FOR 2011 PROXY STATEMENT

Any stockholder of the Company wishing to have a proposal considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy solicitation materials relating to the Company’s 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must, in addition to other applicable requirements, give notice of such proposal in writing to the Secretary of the Company at its principal executive offices and such notice must be received on or before December 24, 2010. The proposal may be included in next year’s proxy statement if it complies with certain rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. Proposals must be submitted in accordance with the Company’s Bylaws and comply with SEC regulations promulgated pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act.

29

Table of Contents

OTHER MATTERS

At the time of preparation of this Proxy Statement, the board of directors of the Company was not aware of any other matters to be brought before the Annual Meeting. No eligible stockholder had submitted notice of any proposal 90 days before the date of the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters are properly presented for action, in the absence of instructions to the contrary, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy to vote, or refrain from voting, in accordance with their respective best judgment on such matters.

If a stockholder desires to have a proposal presented at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders in 2011 and the proposal is not intended to be included in the Company’s related 2011 proxy solicitation materials, the stockholder must give advance notice to the Company in accordance with the Company’s Bylaws. Pursuant to the Company’s Bylaws, only such business shall be conducted, and only such proposals shall be acted upon at an annual meeting of stockholders as are properly brought before the meeting. For business to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a stockholder, in addition to any other applicable requirements, timely notice of the matter must first be given to the Secretary. To be timely, a stockholder’s written notice must be delivered to the Secretary at the Company’s principal executive offices not later than the 90th day nor earlier than the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after such anniversary date, then notice of the stockholder proposal must be delivered to the Secretary not earlier than the 120th day nor later than the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made. If such proposal is for a nominee for director, such stockholder’s notice must set forth with respect to such director nominee all of the information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations for elections of directors under the rules of the SEC; for any stockholder proposal, the notice must comply with Section 2.2 of Article II of the Company’s Bylaws (a copy of which is available upon request to the Secretary of the Company), which section requires that the notice contain a brief description of such proposal and the reasons for conducting such business at the annual meeting, the name and address, as they appear on the Company’s books, of the stockholder making such proposal, the number of shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock beneficially owned by such stockholder and any material interest of such stockholder in such proposal.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and the rules promulgated thereunder and applicable requirements of NASDAQ, officers and directors of the Company and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the common stock of the Company are required to: (a) report their initial ownership and change in ownership with respect to all equity securities of the Company; and (b) furnish such reports to the Company.

Based solely on its review of the copies of such reports received by it during or with respect to the year ended December 31, 2009, and/or written representations from such reporting persons, the Company believes that its officers, directors and more than ten-percent stockholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to such individuals.

30

Table of Contents

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2009, including audited financial statements, is being made available to stockholders along with these proxy materials, but such Annual Report is not incorporated herein and is not deemed to be a part of this Proxy Statement. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the SEC (without exhibits) is available to stockholders via the Company’s Internet website ( www.salem.cc ) or without charge on written request to the Company. Exhibits to the Annual Report on Form 10-K may be obtained from the Company upon payment of the Company’s reasonable expenses to furnish such exhibits. To obtain any of these materials, contact Christopher J. Henderson, Secretary, Salem Communications Corporation, 4880 Santa Rosa Road, Camarillo, California 93012.

By order of the board of directors,

CHRISTOPHER J. HENDERSON

Secretary

Camarillo, California

April 23, 2010

PLEASE VOTE YOUR SHARES ON-LINE, BY TELEPHONE OR BY SIGNING, DATING AND

RETURNING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD TODAY.

NO POSTAGE IS REQUIRED IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES.

If you have any questions, or have any difficulty voting your shares, please telephone Christopher J. Henderson of Salem at (805) 987-0400.

31

Table of Contents

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE TODAY.

We encourage you to take advantage of Internet or telephone voting.

Both are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Internet and telephone voting is available through 11:59 PM Eastern Time the day prior to the annual meeting day.

q  FOLD AND DETACH HERE  q

The BOARD OF DIRECTORS recommends a vote “FOR” all proposals.

NOTE: Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such.

Table of Contents

You can now access your Salem Communications Corporation account online.

Access your Salem Communications Corporation account online via Investor ServiceDirect^® (ISD).

BNY Mellon Shareowner Services, the transfer agent for Salem Communications Corporation, now makes it easy and convenient to get current information on your shareholder account.

Visit us on the web at http://www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/isd

For Technical Assistance Call 1-877-978-7778 between 9am-7pm

Monday-Friday Eastern Time

Investor ServiceDirect^®

Available 24 hours per day, 7 days per week

TOLL FREE NUMBER: 1-800-370-1163

Important notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Proxy Statement and the 2009 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at: http://www.proxyvoting.com/salm

q  FOLD AND DETACH HERE  q

SALEM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

PROXY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD JUNE 2, 2010

Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors

The undersigned hereby authorizes Edward G. Atsinger III and Christopher J. Henderson, and each of them individually, with power of substitution, to vote and otherwise represent all of the shares of Class A common stock of Salem Communications Corporation (“Salem”), held of record by the undersigned, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Salem to be held at Salem’s corporate office, 4880 Santa Rosa Road, Camarillo, California 93012, on Wednesday, June 2, 2010, at 9:30 a.m. local time, and any postponement(s) or adjournment(s) thereof, as indicated on the reverse side hereof.

The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement dated, in each case, April     , 2010. All other proxies heretofore given by the undersigned to vote shares of Salem’s Class A common stock are expressly revoked.

The shares represented by this proxy will be voted as described on the reverse hereof by the stockholder. If not otherwise directed, this proxy will be voted FOR the election as directors of all nominees nominated in Item 1 for which the stockholder is entitled to vote.

Table of Contents

SALEM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

PROXY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS